Umbrella vs Limited comparison
So you decided to enter the freelance market and become a contractor? But of course starting off is so full of uncertainty and potential risk that you looked for the simple and easy route to entering the market – an Umbrella solution. Naturally, back then it seemed like the right thing to do. After all, you gain many of the freedoms of being a freelance worker without any of the long-term commitments. And making the most financially out of the decision was perhaps lower down your list of priorities. But as time progresses, you may begin to think and ask whether your working solution truly reflects the high degree of professionalism with which you provide your skills. And are you making the most of all the opportunities available to you as a contractor? Being in business is a challenge – there’s no denying that. And the challenge is not for everyone. So why complicate your life with running your own business? Is it all about money or is there simply a better way to fulfil your original objectives? No doubt part of the decision making process when moving to contracting was about the money … finally being paid what you’re really worth. Having choice and that feeling of freedom, gaining a wider experience in different working environments and being able to take chunks of time off when it suits you are also arguments we have heard for making that leap into the unknown. But eventually we all ask ourselves … are we doing the right thing, and are we doing it the right way? So, what are the alternatives … and where can you get a truly unbiased view of the pros and cons of each? Well, we at Intouch are providers of Limited Company solutions, so we obviously have a vested interest in explaining just why you should make the switch to running your own business. But that’s not what we’re here to do… We agree that being an Umbrella can be the sensible option if it feels right, if you’re happy with the solution and you feel you’re going to get the most from how you operate. But let’s explain the differences between being Limited and being an Umbrella in a straight-forward, honest way … the “warts and all” … and leave you to answer that key question yourself … am I doing the right thing, in the right way? Umbrella vs Limited – the “low down” One of the main advantages of an Umbrella is its simplicity. You get a contract, refer to your Umbrella company, and it’s all systems go. All you need to do is record your time, record your expenses and … hey presto … you get paid. You don’t even have to worry about tax – it’s all dealt with for you. Hey, take the money and run, why not? But is the choice really that simple? We like to think that there are contractors out there who are concerned about getting the most from their efforts. After all, whether you are working through an Umbrella or through a company, your day-to-day work is exactly the same … you go to the client, you work, you hope to get paid. But what if you could get paid MORE…? Well the answer depends on whether you judge your income level by the rate you charge or the amount you take home to spend. The simple answer is that whether or not you are subject to IR35 you can take home more money for the same effort than you can from an Umbrella. So making the switch from an Umbrella to your own company is a bit like an immediate uplift in pay. Although unfortunately there is a price – admin! But is the price really that much? And who can honestly say they don’t want a pay rise? Let’s take a look at an example … To get us going, let’s make some assumptions… You work 35 hours a week for £40 an hour. You work 45 weeks a year. Whether you are an Umbrella worker or a Limited Company contractor your income is the same – £63,000. You claim the same travelling and subsistence expenses whether you work via an Umbrella or a company; let’s say £100 a week, so that’s £4,500. You want to pay some pension, say £200 a month; and a bit of sickness cover, say £45 a month, so those cost you £2,940. Basically no difference whether you’re an Umbrella or a company either! You pay an Umbrella £25 a week plus VAT, but only when you work, we’ll use Intouch’s monthly fee here of £85 per month plus VAT. So we have a slight difference here. An Umbrella is costing you £1,350 and Intouch costs you £1,224. But hang on … is that right? How can an accountant cost less than an Umbrella? Ok let’s reduce the weekly fee for the umbrella to £20 a week plus VAT – that’s £1,080 (hope you don’t pay more!) Ok are there any other differences in the numbers we are going to work with? Yes, there are many costs you can claim against tax as a company you can’t usually claim through an Umbrella, what about:- The computer you use when working at home needed replacing, now that costs £800 including the printer, and the running costs and a bit of legitimate software are about £400 a year
- The mobile phone, which you can put in the company name, let’s say £480 a year
- Maybe some use of home as an office, let’s say £156, plus some of your home phone, say £80, it’s not a real cost but you can have some tax deducted anyway
- Your subscriptions to a professional body, and a couple of techie magazines, that’s £240 a year
- That all important staff party for you and your wife, that’s £300
- Life insurance, got to be careful here, but there are some clever products that can be paid by the company without taxes being charged, that’s another £480
|
Umbrella |
Limited |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Income |
63,000 |
63,000 |
|
Flat rate profit |
– |
1,638 |
|
Total income |
63,000 |
64,638 |
|
Travelling |
4,500 |
4,500 |
|
Pension and insurance |
2,450 |
2,450 |
|
Fees |
1,080 |
1,224 |
|
Other expense claims |
– |
2,916 |
|
Spouses wage |
– |
7,200 |
|
Own wage |
49,212 |
12,000 |
|
Employers NI |
5758 |
622 |
|
Profit |
0 |
33,725 |
|
Tax payable |
||
|
Corporation tax |
0 |
6,745 |
|
Income tax |
9,569 |
779 |
|
NIC |
4,321 |
529 |
|
Employers |
5,758 |
622 |
|
Total tax |
19,648 |
8,675 |